<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics.za: SA Political Websites Are Fugly</title>
    <link>http://politics.za.net/articles/2006/01/11/sa-political-websites-are-fugly</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Third world country. First world politics.</description>
    <item>
      <title>SA Political Websites Are Fugly</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.coda.co.za/"&gt;Coda&lt;/a&gt; takes a look at some political parties and &lt;a href="http://coda.co.za/archive/20060111/02:14:22"&gt;finds&lt;/a&gt; most are more &amp;#8220;eish&amp;#8221; than &amp;#8220;kief&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;And security holes abound as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:52:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:bec36c031ce25e63c43a3388412c98ad</guid>
      <author>Farrel</author>
      <link>http://politics.za.net/articles/2006/01/11/sa-political-websites-are-fugly</link>
      <category>ANC</category>
      <category>DA</category>
      <category>IFP</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://politics.za.net/articles/trackback/35</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
