<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics.za: Telecommunication Act Written By US Firm</title>
    <link>http://politics.za.net/articles/2007/08/24/telecommunication-act-written-by-us-firm</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Third world country. First world politics.</description>
    <item>
      <title>Telecommunication Act Written By US Firm</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Readers of this blog will be familiar with our constant harping on the &lt;a href="http://politics.za.net/articles/2007/01/19/the-more-of-this-you-read-the-more-infuriated-you-become"&gt;dire situation of telecommunications&lt;/a&gt; in South Africa. After Telkom was semi-privatised and a chunk sold to a consortium including US telco &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBC&lt;/span&gt; Communications (now AT&amp;#38;T, whose name it took when it acquired it). Telkom was given a 5 year monopoly (which has become a defacto 14 year monopoly at the very least) in exchange for providing telecommunications service to under serviced areas, which they never did.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;After Telkom&amp;#8217;s legislated 5 year monopoly was up &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBC&lt;/span&gt; sold their stock for a massive profit, packed their bags and South Africa has been struggling with a complete messed up telecoms industry ever snice.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;And that&amp;#8217;s probably because the Telecommunications Act which set up our current environment was written with the help of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBC&lt;/span&gt; to ensure they made profit before they did the ol&amp;#8217; cut and run.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;In an interview with the authors last year, Myers explained that when it became clear that &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBC&lt;/span&gt; would secure the Telkom stake, &lt;strong&gt;&amp;#8220;the company temporarily transferred its entire San Antonio [Texas] corporate office legislative team to South Africa to help draft the Telecommunications Act, to make sure the legislation comported with the company&amp;#8217;s requirements&amp;#8221;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Myers told Horwitz and Currie that &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBC&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;s strategy was very clear: &amp;#8220;Maximise the value of Thintana&amp;#8217;s investment during Telkom&amp;#8217;s five-year exclusivity period and then exit quickly.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#8217;t help but think the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ANC&lt;/span&gt; got taken for a complete ride by &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBC&lt;/span&gt; (and probably then decided to get in on the act when Andile Ngcaba and his Elephant Consortium saw the massive profits Telkom was making) and our lethargic Communication Dept and toothless regulator &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ICASA&lt;/span&gt; have been unable, or unwilling, to do anything about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:cbfb761c-80be-4994-aefc-e068e429df81</guid>
      <author>Farrel</author>
      <link>http://politics.za.net/articles/2007/08/24/telecommunication-act-written-by-us-firm</link>
      <category>National Government</category>
      <category>Communications</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
