<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics.za: Too Many Amendments</title>
    <link>http://politics.za.net/articles/2006/03/21/too-many-amendments</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Third world country. First world politics.</description>
    <item>
      <title>Too Many Amendments</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with Tony Leon, there have been &lt;a href="http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&amp;#38;click_id=6&amp;#38;art_id=vn20060321051113161C402714"&gt;too many amendments&lt;/a&gt; to the Constitution of South Africa. Although I don&amp;#8217;t think it&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;under threat&amp;#8217; per se&amp;#8217;, the number of amendments passed so far do seem to make the constitution less &amp;#8216;written in stone&amp;#8217; than it should be.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;As an example it took the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;US 162&lt;/span&gt; years to pass 14 amendments to their constitution. It should take us about 12. Perhaps that is because of the differing nature of the each constitution. The US constitution is a document defining what government may or may not do, while ours is one that tells the people what thet may or may not do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:410fdc86d0e945263718eafae6f10076</guid>
      <author>Farrel</author>
      <link>http://politics.za.net/articles/2006/03/21/too-many-amendments</link>
      <category>Justice &amp; Constitutional Development</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://politics.za.net/articles/trackback/81</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
